23Aug05 Update

2006
Rules and Vehicle Design
Rules Posting:
Entry Deadline:
The contest rules may be augmented/supplemented at any time during the
competition.
During the period from the rules posting up to the entry deadline the FAQ will
be used to document any changes.
Following the entry deadline changes will be e-mailed to each teams contact
e-mail address.
Questions may be submitted at any time, answers will be provided ONLY as
outlined above.
Summary:
The AIAA through the Applied Aerodynamics, Aircraft Design, Design Engineering and Flight Test Technical Committees and the AIAA Foundation invites all university students to participate in the Cessna/ONR Student Design/Build/Fly Competition. The contest will provide a real-world aircraft design experience for engineering students by giving them the opportunity to validate their analytic studies.
Student teams will design, fabricate, and demonstrate the flight capabilities of an unmanned, electric powered, radio controlled aircraft that can best meet the specified mission profile. The goal is a balanced design possessing good demonstrated flight handling qualities and practical and affordable manufacturing requirements while providing a high vehicle performance.
To encourage innovation and maintain a fresh design challenge for each new year, the design requirements and performance objectives will be updated for each new contest year. The changes will provide new design requirements and opportunities, while allowing for application of technology developed by the teams from prior years.
Check the rules package carefully as items and approaches that were legal in past years may not be legal for this contest year. Only the contents of this Rules package, the 2006 FAQ, and 2006 Q&A documents hold bearing on the requirements and/or allowances for the current contest year. It is the responsibility of the teams to know and follow all provided rules, the FAQ, and all contest day briefings.
Questions may be addressed to the contest director as outline in the communications section below.
Cash prizes are $2500 for 1st, $1500 for 2nd and $1000 for 3rd place. The winning team will be invited to present their design at an AIAA conference hosted by the sponsoring technical committees.
Judging:
Students must design, document, fabricate, and demonstrate the aircraft they determine to be capable of achieving the highest score on the specified mission profile(s). Flight scores will be based on the demonstrated mission performance obtained during the contest.
Each team must also submit a written Design Report. A maximum of 100 points will be awarded for the team design report. Scores for the written reports will be announced at the beginning of the fly-off.
Each aircraft will have computed a Rated Aircraft Cost, reflecting the complexity/technology of the design.
The overall team score is a combination of the Design Report, Rated Aircraft Cost and Flight scores. The team with the highest overall team score will be declared the winner.
Scores will be FINAL 7 working days after the completion of the contest. This period will allow for review of the scores in a timely fashion following the contest.
All submitted reports are the property of AIAA, Cessna and ONR and may be published or reproduced at their discretion.
Contest Site:
Host for the competition will be
the Cessna Aircraft Company. The fly-off is planned to be held at their
facilities in
Team Requirements:
All team members (except for non-student pilots)
must be full time students at an accredited University or College and student
members of the AIAA.
At least 1/3 of the team members must consist of Freshman, Sophomores or Juniors.
The pilot must be an AMA (
Past Year Reports:
The top scoring report from the past year’s competition will be available for reference on the contest web site. The team with the top scoring report from this year’s contest will be required to submit an electronic copy of their report following the competition, which will be placed on the contest web site for the next year’s competition.
Sponsorship:
Teams may solicit and accept sponsorship in the form of funds or materials and components from commercial organizations. All design, analysis and fabrication of the contest entry is the sole responsibility of the student team members.
Schedule:
A completed electronic entry must be RECEIVED by the contest administrator on or before
The entry form for the DBF is different from the ones used for all other AIAA student competitions. The DBF entry form is a MS-Word file and can be found on the contest web site. It must be submitted by e-mail to the contest administrator at greg.page@nrl.navy.mil . Be sure to include the Phone and FAX number for your team advisor and at least one student contact so we may reach you in case of any last minute problems or changes. All teams are required to provide two point-of-contact e-mail addresses with their contest application, one of which must be the teams advisor. It is the teams responsibility to make sure the e-mail contact addresses they supply remain active during the entire period from entry to the close of the competition, as e-mail will be the primary means to provide information and updates.
Please Note: The Entry Name may not be changed once the form is submitted, but must be retained and used on all reports and correspondence during the competition year.
Written reports (5 hard copies, electronic reports will not be accepted), must ARRIVE at the Chief of Scoring address by 5 pm local time on 7 March 2006. Reports will be judged “as received”, no “corrections/additions/page changes” will be made by the organizers so check your reports carefully before sending them.
(A note primarily for foreign entrants but also allowed for domestic teams. If sending the report by courier is prohibitive you may send it electronically to a commercial printer (KINKO’s comes to mind) local to the report submission address and have them print/collate and DELIVER the reports to meet the deadline. No deadline exceptions will be made, but this may be easier than international courier service.)
The contest is scheduled for 21-23 April 2006. The
competition will run from
Please note that tech inspections will be available on Friday 21 April. All teams are encouraged to be prepared to have your plane inspected on Friday. Inspections will also be available on Saturday, but waiting until Saturday to go through tech may mean that your team will miss one or more rounds through the flight queue. If we have a full turnout you may not be able to get in a full set of scoring flights unless you are "ready to fly" at every opportunity.
Late entries will NOT be accepted. Late or incomplete report submissions will NOT be judged. Teams who do not submit the required written reports will NOT be allowed to fly. It is the team’s responsibility to assure that all deadlines are met, as they will be strictly enforced.
Communications:
The contest administration will maintain a World Wide Web site containing the latest information regarding the contest schedules, rules, and participating teams. The contest web site will also contain a list of potential suppliers for materials and equipment available to build an entry. The contest web site is located at:
http://www.ae.uiuc.edu/aiaadbf
Questions regarding the contest, schedules, or rules interpretation may be sent to the contest administrator by e-mail at:
greg.page@nrl.navy.mil
Questions received prior to the official entry submission date will not be answered directly. Select questions “may” be answered in the FAQ prior to the entry submission date. Official questions and answers received following the entry submission date will be provided by e-mail to all teams of record.
Written reports (only) should be sent to the Chief of Scoring at:
AIAA Design/Build/Fly
Contest/Report Judging
Mr. David Levy
Cessna Aircraft Company
5701 East Pawnee MS-PAW
Wichita, KS 67218
316-831-2014
Aircraft Requirements - General
Aircraft Requirements - Safety
All vehicles will undergo a safety inspection by a designated contest safety inspector prior to being allowed to make any competition or non-competition (i.e. practice) flight. All decisions of the safety inspector are final. Safety inspections will include the following as a minimum.
Throttle closed
Full up elevator
Full right rudder
Full right (or left) aileron
Full Flaps down (if so equipped)
The radio Fail Safe provisions will be strictly enforced.
Teams must complete the flight missions as outlined in the mission matrix below. Teams will have a maximum of 5 flight attempts. A flight attempt is defined as advancing the throttle “stick” for take-off, or going past the 2 minute preparation time. The best Single Flight Score from each of 2 different mission types will be summed for the team's Total Flight Score.
In the event that, due to time or facility limitations, it is not possible to allow all teams to have the maximum number of flight attempts, the contest committee reserves the right to ration and/or schedule flights. The exact determination of how to ration flights will be made on the contest day based on the number of entries, weather, and field conditions.
Each team's overall score will be computed from their Written Report Score, Total Flight Score, and the Rated Aircraft Cost using the formula:
SCORE = Written Report Score *
Total Flight Score
Rated Aircraft Cost
|
|
Description |
|
|
General Mission Information · Aircraft must fit into a 4 foot x 2 foot x 1-1/4 foot internal dimension box. · Aircraft must be designed and be physically capable of supporting all specified missions even if it is the intent or practice of the team to fly only one or two of the missions during the contest. · Cargo must be securely restrained in the aircraft by mechanical means. Tape and Velcro are not allowed restraining methods. · Payloads may not be carried in external pods. · Speed Loaders may be used but may not be loaded until the ground crew is directed to start the payload loading/unloading operation (ie. They can not be pre-loaded while the aircraft is in the air on a prior lap). · On all flight laps the aircraft must complete at least one 360o turn in the opposite direction of the flight pattern. · Take-off distance is 100 ft wheels off the runway. For each take-off of a multi-sortie mission the aircraft may be returned to the start line for each new take-off, or may start from it’s present location providing that location is “past” the take-off line. In either case the maximum take-off distance allowance will be MEASURED from the start line. · Note: There is no timed-repair of damage allowed in this year’s competition. · Maximum mission time is 10 minutes. |
|
Cargo Flexibility |
DF = 10.0 · Aircraft must be capable of carrying all of the three standard payloads:
The contest administration will supply the payload items to be flown so all teams will be using the same payloads. · Special “inserts” may be used to aid in securing the cargo, but must be installed/removed as part of the team cargo handling time. Payloads may not be installed into the cargo handler until the designated “Loading_Time”. · The “Loading_Time” will be the cumulative loading/unloading time (in minutes), flight time is not included. · “Loading_Time” for each lap starts when the team is cleared to go and get the payload and begin loading and ends when the prior payload is returned to the staging area and the aircraft is secured and begins the take-off roll. On the final lap “Loading Time” begins when the aircraft stops moving and ends when the last payload is removed and returned to the staging area. ·
For partial missions there will be a 3 minute
penalty for each payload not flown. Payloads must be flown in the order
specified. ·
· Single Flight Score is: |
|
Minimum RAC |
DF = 150 · Aircraft must carry 96 loose tennis balls for a minimum flight (air) time of 2 minutes. Tennis balls are 2.5-2.625” diameter and 57-58g. The contest administration will supply the payload items to be flown so all teams will be using the same payloads. · You may carry all of the balls on a single flight if desired, or you may make multiple flights each with fewer balls. · There is no score if you do not successfully fly all of the required payload. · Mission Profile:
· Single Flight Score is: |
|
Incremental Payload |
DF= 1.25 · Aircraft will fly as many laps as the team determines possible. On each lap the payload to be carried will be increased. · Mission Profile:
· Single
Flight Score is: |
Aircraft that run off the runway before reaching the start line may be returned to the runway to taxi back to the line or may be carried to the line by the ground crew as determined by the requirements of the specific mission.
Aircraft Cost Model:
Rated Aircraft Cost
(RAC) = MEW
|
Coef. |
Description |
Value |
|
MEW |
Manufacturers Empty Weight |
Actual airframe weight [lb] WITH all flight and propulsion batteries but without any payload. |
General Mission Specification and Notes:
· Aircraft are to remain assembled while waiting in the queue. Teams will install the propulsion batteries once reaching the 3rd “On Deck” position (i.e. when the aircraft is 3rd in the queue, the team must begin to install the batteries).
· Aircraft may not have any work performed in the starting line queue, other than as specified above at the 3rd On Deck position. Aircraft propulsion batteries may be left out of the aircraft when in line.
· Aircraft batteries may be charged while the aircraft is in the queue IF AND ONLY IF the batteries are removed from the aircraft.
· The aircraft propulsion system(s) must be disarmed or "safed" during any time when crew members are preparing the aircraft.
· Maximum flight support crew is: pilot, observer, and 3 ground crew. Only the designated ground crew may reload the aircraft payload . Pilot and observer may be members of the ground crew, provided total ground crew size remains 3 people.
· Observer and all ground crew must be students. Only the pilot may be a non-student.
· The upwind turn will be made after passing the upwind pylon. The downwind turn will be made after passing the downwind pylon. Upwind and downwind pylons will be 500 ft from the starting line. Aircraft must be "straight and level" when passing the pylon before initiating the turn.
· Aircraft must land on the paved portion of the runway. Aircraft may "run-off" the runway during roll-out.
· After landing, aircraft may taxi back to the starting line. Alternatively, aircraft may be carried back to the starting line; however, the team may not leave the pit area to retrieve the aircraft until the aircraft has come to a complete stop, and they are signaled it is "Ok" to retrieve the aircraft by the flight line judge. Aircraft experiencing significant damage during landing will be considered to have completed their flight where they come to rest and may not be “carried” to the starting line to “complete” a lap. Determination of “significant –vs- non-critical” damage will be made by the flight line judges. Aircraft with “significant” damage will not receive a score for that flight. Aircraft with “non-critical” damage may continue to the disassembly task with no penalty.
· Flight altitude must be sufficient for safe terrain clearance and low enough to maintain good visual contact with the aircraft. Decisions on safe flight altitude will be at the discretion of the flight line judges and all rulings will be final.
Additional information is included in the FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions).
Protest Procedures
Submitting a protest is a serious matter and will be treated as such. Teams may submit a protest to the Contest Administration at any time during the competition. Protests must be submitted in writing and signed by the team advisor, designees are not allowed for protest submissions. If the team advisor is not present, he may FAX a signed protest to the team for them to present. Protests may be posted for review at the decision of the administration.
Protests and penalties (up to disqualification from the contest for deliberate attempts to misinform officials, violate the contest rules, or safety infractions) will be decided by the Contest Administration. The decision of the Contest Administration is final.
Design Report:
Each team will submit a judged design report as outlined below. The submission date is contained in the schedule section of this document.
Reports must be bound. Simple spiral bindings are sufficient and preferred; 3-ring binders are not allowed. Paper clips or clamps are NOT sufficient. Unbound reports will not be scored. Stapled reports are discouraged and will be penalized 10 points. Report paper may be no larger than 8 ˝ inches wide by 11 inches long with the exception of the drawing package. A4 paper may be used ONLY if it is cut to a maximum length of 11 inches. The drawing package may be on 11 inch long x maximum of 17 inch wide pages. A 10 point penalty will be given for the use of oversize paper.
Absolute maximum page count for the report is 60 pages, inclusive of all pages of any type, printed or blank, including the front and back covers. Reports exceeding the maximum page count will be given a 10 point penalty for each additional page.
All reports should be at least one and one half line spacing, 10-pt Arial font. Tables and figures will also be at least 10-pt Arial font. Margins should be at least 1 inch on all sides. All figures and tables should be clear and readable for the judges. The reports will be judged on format and readability.
Reports will be scored on a 100 point basis following the guidelines outlined below. All information used for scoring must be in the outlined sections, content that is out of sequence, including the drawing package, will be treated as missing and scored accordingly.
Report scores will not be available prior to the contest weekend.
Please note that the judges will be using this same report outline for evaluating reports. ALL items listed will be expected to be present, easy to locate and identify, and be well documented in the report for a maximum score.
Please do not ship reports packed in “packing peanuts”. The scoring judge must redistribute the reports to up to 40 individual judges for review so please keep your packaging recyclable and as compact as possible.
Report scoring is based on the reports AS SUBMITTED. Final proofing of the report printed copies (ALL) prior to submission is STRONGLY encouraged.
Design Report
All sections will be weighted for format, completeness and readability
1. Executive
Summary: (5 points):
Provide a summary of the development of your design. This should be a narrative
description highlighting the major areas in the development process for your
final configuration and a broad description of the range of design alternatives
investigated.
2. Management
Summary (5 points):
Describe the organization of the design team. Provide a chart of design
personnel and assignment areas. Include a (single) milestone chart showing
planned and actual timing of major elements of the design process, including as
a minimum the conceptual design stage, preliminary design stage, detailed
design stage, flight testing and report preparation periods.
3. Conceptual
Design (20 points):
Describe the key elements of the mission requirements (problem
statement). Document the alternative configuration concepts (e.g.
biplane, canard, flying wing, pusher -Vs tractor, number of engines etc.)
investigated during the conceptual design stage and the reason why each concept
was considered. Describe and document the numerical figures of merit (FOM's)
used to screen competing concepts, and the mission feature each FOM was
selected to support. Rated
Aircraft Cost (RAC) MUST be one of the FOM’s used
during the screening process, teams should generate a sufficiently accurate RAC
estimate to differentiate between design concepts. Numerical data need
not be extensive at this stage, but should include as a minimum: a final
ranking chart giving the quantitative value of each design for each FOM.
4. Preliminary
Design (30 points):
Document the design parameter and sizing trades investigated during the
preliminary design stage, and why each was felt to be important to the mission.
Describe the analysis methods used. Describe the mission model used and the
predicted performance. Provide estimates of the aircraft lift, drag and
stability characteristics. Document the design optimization and trade
studies conducted and their results.
5. Detail
Design (15 points for discussion items, 10 points for drawing package, 25
points total for the section):
Document component selection and systems architecture selection. Include your
final competition aircraft's Rated Aircraft Cost using the
contest supplied cost model. RAC table should include all input
parameter, intermediate and final computation.
Include a table giving data for the sized aircraft. The table should
include;
Geometry: length, span, height, wing area, Aspect Ratio, control volumes
Performance: CL max, L/D max, maximum Rate of Climb, stall speed, maximum
speed, take-off field length (two sets, empty and gross weight)
Weight and Balance Statement (airframe, propulsion system, control system,
payload system, payload, empty weight, gross weight, Center of Gravity)
Systems (radio used, servos used, battery configuration used, motor used,
propeller (nominal), gear ratio (if used))
The Drawing Package will be included with this section and must contain
drawings of the design in sufficient detail to indicate aircraft size and
configuration; primary structure component size and location; payload size,
location and restraint method; and location of propulsion and flight control
system components.
6. Manufacturing
Plan and processes (5 points):
Document the process selected for manufacture of major components and
assemblies of the final design. Detail the manufacturing processes investigated,
and describe the FOM's used (including but not limited to: availability,
required skill levels and cost) to screen competing concepts. Describe the
analytic methods (cost, skill matrix, scheduling time lines) used to select the
final set of manufacturing processes. Include a manufacturing milestone chart
showing scheduled event timings.
7. Testing
Plan (10 points):
Detail testing objectives, schedules, check-lists, results and any lessons
learned for component and full aircraft testing, both static and dynamic (ie.
in flight). Realistic test schedules and expectations, ability to measure
any key mission/design parameters.

[AIAA Student Design/Build/Fly Competition homepage] [AIAA Homepage]